THE Manhattan offices of Eco Securities were eerily empty last Thursday
morning. Over the rows of unoccupied desks, two men could be seen peering
out of the 19th-floor windows — a sight that might have aroused concern
considering the company has been in the headlines recently for its plunging
share price.
In his corner office, Bruce Usher, the London-listed firm’s chief executive,
was quick to explain nothing untoward was about to happen. The staff members
were looking for a hawk that had taken to perching on the floor above. The
rest of his crew were off for the day to take part in Green Week — an annual
eco-awareness jamboree — and were gathering up bottles for recycling.
Usually, Eco Securities staff are employed at the vanguard of another solution
to the global ecological crisis. The company is the largest trader of carbon
credits, a system established under the Kyoto protocol, the international
agreement to tackle global warming, which aims to encourage free-market
solutions to the problem.
Global warming is by definition a global problem, and Kyoto established the
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), a market for tradable credits that
western companies can buy to meet their pollution requirements. These are
then used to finance green schemes in the developing world.
The world is making ever more hot air. Trade in greenhouse gases, worth about
¤40 billion (£31 billion) last year, is expected to increase to ¤63 billion
next year, according to Point Carbon, a market analyst. Most trading is done
in London.
But while the principle of the CDM has taken off, policing the market has
proved tricky and time-consuming for the market’s under-resourced watchdog,
the United Nations. Meanwhile, Eco Securities and the rest of the industry
have been hit by an ever-shifting maze of international legislation and
byzantine discussions on the next stage of the world’s response to global
warming. Eco Securities’ shares have fallen 70% this year.
“There’s a lot of misunderstanding about what is happening and it’s very
frustrating,” said Usher.
Despite this, he stressed that the CDM works, and calculates that by 2012 the
scheme will have reduced emissions of carbon dioxide by between one and two
billion tonnes.
“The problem is that we are emitting 20 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide a
year. So in the next five years we are going to emit another 100 billion
tonnes. CDM works but it’s just not enough,” he said.
Most of Usher’s problems now centre on the approval of schemes. The UN
appoints local inspectors, companies known as designated operation entities,
to sign off on the creditworthiness of green schemes.
But the auditors are so overloaded with schemes that Usher said: “You
literally cannot book their time. We are having to book designated operation
entities a year in advance.
“They are all over capacity. There are about 2,000 projects — we have 400 —
and there are only a few of these companies. They simply don’t have the
ability to deal with all these projects quickly,” he said.
Carbon credits are not the answer to our planets pollution problems. The burning of carbon fuels is the problem and companies and governments would be better to spent their money on renewable energy schemes. The high oil price should be telling everyone that the Carbon Credit Scheme is a failure.
Jim Wills, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Man made global warming belief has become a religion. Requiring more blind faith to believe than any other of the worlds "faiths" . Those who discount it or disagree with it are labeled by the "Gorites" as heretics . I wonder how long before the inquisition starts? Run for your life
Bill, Saugatuck, USA
"Global Warming" is a misnomer. It is really "Global Fleecing."
Global Warming is a trend no doubt, a simple natural cycle of nature. But Anthropogenic Global Warming (aka the Al Gore hypothesis) is discredited science at best, intentional fraud at worst, and is being soundly refuted.
Scott, Durham, NC, USA