BAE Systems, Europe's largest defence contractor at the centre of corruption
claims over its arms deals with Saudi Arabia, has been urged to review
business practices and install tougher anti-corruption measures.
An independent report by Lord Woolf, the former Lord Chief Justice of England
and Wales, recommended 23 measures which would improve transparency and
raise ethical standards.
Lord Woolf warned in the report: "Despite the progress made, the company
has a substantial task ahead if it is to meet higher standards."
"If reputational issues are not promptly addressed they are likely to
fester," he said.
Lord Woolf said that BAE had admitted it had not focused enough on ethical
practices: "Critically, both the chairman and chief executive, in
discussions with us, acknowledged that the company did not in the past pay
sufficient attention to ethical standards and avoid activities that had the
potential to give rise to reputational damage."
Dick Olver, the BAE chairman, said: “The Committee’s publication of this
report is an important step towards BAE Systems’ objective of achieving
benchmark standards of governance in the conduct of its day-to-day business."
BAE said that it would provide more feedback and details of the measures it
intends to undertake by the end of July.
The report also calls for BAE to commission an external audit of its ethical
business conduct and its management of reputational risk within three years
and further reports should be commissioned at regular intervals thereafter.
The group needs to develop a code of business ethics and the board's Corporate
Responsibility Committee should take charge of ethical conduct and
reputational risk.
Lord Woolf said that BAE should create a team, led by a senior executive
reporting to the chief financial officer and responsible for ensuring there
are high ethical standards across the group.
It should also set up central registers for the monitoring of gifts and
corporate hospitality.
He called for both external and internal audits to form the basis of a public
update to shareholders each year in its annual report.
Lord Woolf has recommended that the ability of senior executives and the heads
of BAE's business units to demonstrate high ethical standards should be
reflected in their performance appraisals and the variable element of their
remuneration.
BAE has already revealed in its latest annual report that senior executives
will be set higher targets in ethics and safety. These targets will make up
12 per cent of potential bonuses for 2008.
The commissioning of the Woolf report has been heavily criticised for the
limitations of its scope.
It has examined BAE's current practices, but did not look at the Saudi
contracts into which the Serious Fraud Office conducted a bribery and
corruption investigation.
This investigation was ordered to be dropped by the Government on the grounds
of national security.
The High Court ruled last month that the Serious Fraud Office acted unlawfully
in its decision to drop the investigation. The SFO is set to take the matter
before the House of Lords.
Last October, Mike Turner, BAE's chief executive, announced he would step down
once his contract runs out in August this year. The announcement came just
months after Mr Turner had announced his intention to run the company for
another five years.
It is believed that Mr Olver wanted to bring in a new blood to help implement
a new, less aggressive corporate culture.
The group may announce a successor to Mr Turner at tomorrow's annual meeting.
Britain needs business
We send soldiers to fight and die defending these contracts in Arabia. We will always send soldiers to fight and die defending these contracts.
Lets face it with out the contracts why would we be in the Middle East
Give to Ceasar what is Ceasars ie Saudi Royals
Nicholas Iles, Oswestry, Shropshire
tim b, Peterborough......
....the Spitfire was very much a 'death machine' --- thank God!
....and please do pause before you buy any products from Norway --- a country that hunts whales...
So how far do you want to stretch the ethics issue....?
Phil, Preston,
I believe it is completely necessary for us to operate to the highest ethical standards, which shall give us a position of moral authority -
but will cost BAESYSTEMS/UK in lost contracts/exports/jobs to other countries who aren't as concerned about the morality of the arms trade.
Nathan, Inverness, UK
"ethical standards" from a company that gets rich on flogging death machines?
tim b, Peterborough, UK
Ethical arms trading has always sounded like an oxymoron to me.
Joseph Rogers, Warwick, UK
What a sop!
Not what we asked for and not what we wanted.
So looks like the issues will remain where they were swept, under the carpet!!!
jase, Plymouth,
The Media often resorts to interview burglars when giving advice against burglars. This is a lesson to be learned.
If one examines two judgments in the court of appeal in which Lord Woolf took the lead, one being the genesis of the CPR Part 52.17 proceedure, the other one defending the practice
Robert Poole, Wolverhampton, UK
The Media often resorts to interview burglars when giving advice against burglars. This is a lesson to be learned.
If one examines two judgments in the court of appeal in which Lord Woolf took the lead, one being the genesis of the CPR Part 52.17 proceedure, the other one defending the BM practice
Robert Poole, Wolverhampton, UK